Experimental IRC log swig-2008-11-18

Available formats: content-negotiated html turtle (see SIOC for the vocabulary)

Back to channel and daily index: content-negotiated html turtle

These logs are provided as an experiment in indexing discussions using IRCHub.py, Irc2RDF.hs, and SIOC.

04:29:15<chmod007>if I have a reflexive property, R, with domain X and range Y, does that mean that all owl:Things are related to themselves through R and that X is an equivalent class to owl:Thing?
04:39:49<karlUshi>http://www.biologeek.com/conferences,web-semantique/le-web-semantique-ou-limportance-des-donnees-liees/
04:40:23<karlUshi>A:|Excellent introduction in French about Semantic Web by David Larlet
07:34:52<david`bgk>thanks karlUshi :)
08:21:30<bblfish>what's the difference between union of ranges, and anding ranges ?
08:23:04<bblfish><http://dbpedia.org/ontology/publisher> rdfs:range dbp:Person, dpb:Company .
08:23:08<bblfish>and
08:24:20<bblfish><http://dbpedia.org/ontology/publisher> rdfs:range [ owl:unionOf (dbp:Person dpb:Company ) ]
08:41:02<bblfish>"Multiple domains mean that the domain of the property is the intersection of the identified classes (and similarly for range). " http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/#term_range
08:41:08<bblfish>mhh, easy to forget
10:43:12<bblfish>was there a report on the swig working group meeting in Cannes ?
10:44:10<libby>what sort of a report? by whom? (it's an interest group anyway, not a wg)
10:44:14<libby>(hi btw!)
10:46:31<bblfish>ah
10:46:33<bblfish>hi libby
10:47:10<bblfish>Ah see, so perhaps that's why we did not have a report
10:47:40<libby>ah I duno, wgs are supposed to do reports are they?
10:48:57<bblfish>well you remember we had a little vote here: http://flickr.com/photos/bblfish/2960968463/
10:53:17<libby>yeah but we never got back to the group after those breakout sessions
10:54:24<libby>and plus I doubt very much that breakout sessions of interest groups have any formal status :)
11:00:41<Anchakor>why semantic web community fucuses so much on real world meetings, conferences etc.? Wouldn't be much better to write good articles that could influence much more people than only those who are able to visit conferences?
11:01:50<Anchakor>focuses*
11:14:11<bblfish>Anchakor: we don't really focus much on confs. I don't at least. I got to a few a year. It's good to meet people though
11:14:48<bblfish>but you are right, much more helpful in the end are working apps
11:15:23<bblfish>I was hoping that meeting would help get something off the ground
11:28:40<Anchakor>well I was hoping some more organised information sources will show up over time but it still seems that little effort is done on making information more accessible for people from different sub-communities...
11:39:22<libby>what do you want, exactly
11:39:23<libby>?
11:48:26<Anchakor>good question
11:48:31<Anchakor>:)
11:50:32<Anchakor>is there any single information source I can show to my friend who is a newbie programmer, where he will find all that he want's to know about semantic web, written following the KISS philosophy? :)
12:26:54<libby>heh :) Anchakor
12:26:57<libby>good question
12:59:53<melvster>Anchakor: perhaps try this http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Getting_started
16:20:41<ericP>anyone got slides for teaching RDF to UML-heads?
16:20:42<phenny>ericP: 29 Oct 13:00Z <kidehen> tell ericP since he is Karlsruhe, he should be able to discuss Berlin SPARQL Benchmark to the nth degree with Orri and Co.
16:20:58<ericP>oops, a bit late
17:32:25<DanC>I wonder if a twitter<->IRC bridge would help fit twitter into my workflow better
18:13:21<dajobe>DanC: I don't think twitter helps anyone's workflow ;)
21:26:19<tommorris>no iand around? anyone here responsible for vocab.org? http://vocab.org/relationship/ isn't responding to my HTTP GET requests.
21:28:08<tommorris>phenny, tell iand that vocab.org and internetalchemy.org are both failing to respond to my HTTP GET requests.
21:28:09<phenny>tommorris: I'll pass that on when iand is around.

Back to channel and daily index: content-negotiated html turtle