Available formats: content-negotiated html turtle (see SIOC for the vocabulary)
Back to channel and daily index: content-negotiated html turtle
These logs are provided as an experiment in indexing discussions using IRCHub.py, Irc2RDF.hs, and SIOC.
| 01:48:40 | <yosemite> | katz bagels? |
| 01:48:43 | <yosemite> | er |
| 01:48:49 | <yosemite> | wrong window... |
| 01:48:52 | <yosemite> | :) |
| 02:37:34 | <drewp> | any openlink folks here? i'm wondering about a workaround for my datetime parsing issue |
| 08:35:21 | <EtnaRosso> | morning all |
| 10:59:44 | <danja> | anyone got any idea how to do regex in sparql where you want everything except the matches? |
| 10:59:58 | <danja> | like FILTER !regex(?title, "^Comment", "i") |
| 11:00:46 | <danja> | (except that doesn't work) |
| 11:01:43 | <AndyS> | Defn of "doesn't work"? It needs () FILTER ( ! regex....) |
| 11:03:19 | <danja> | yay! thanks AndyS |
| 11:03:45 | <danja> | 'fraid the docs around there are a bit hard to parse |
| 11:04:50 | <danja> | guess that calls for some kind of quick reference (maybe one day, time permitting etc...) |
| 11:05:21 | <AndyS> | Only simple cases: e.g. function calls, and function-call like builtins, can skip the (). |
| 11:06:09 | <danja> | oh right, so things with () built in are ok |
| 11:06:38 | <danja> | ACTION playing with Leigh's Twinkle |
| 11:11:26 | <AndyS> | Normally it's FILTER() - there are some special cases when these are not necessary but they are always legal. The same is true for ORDER BY. |
| 11:11:49 | <AndyS> | And (in ARQ and Virtuoso) expressions in the SELECT clause. |
| 11:40:46 | <tommorris> | Good news folks. Yesterday, I got confirmation that SemanticCamp London is happening in February. |
| 11:41:19 | <tommorris> | Just wondering if anyone wants to provide sponsorship for food and other expenses? :) |
| 11:44:47 | <EtnaRosso> | ;) |
| 12:14:16 | <danja> | tommorris, cool - iand might be worth a try re. sponsorship :-) |
| 12:14:42 | <tommorris> | yep, i pestered him about it a while back. :) |
| 12:22:26 | <danbri> | tommorris, what're the dates? |
| 12:46:34 | <sbp> | hmm |
| 12:46:58 | <sbp> | what would you (yes you) call the inverse of the chain of log:semantics and log:uri? |
| 12:47:42 | <sbp> | in other words, ?G is log:semantics of [ log:uri ?URI ] |
| 12:48:01 | <sbp> | what name would you give to ?G :property ?URI? |
| 12:48:22 | <sbp> | I've been thinking of source, or sourceURI, or... |
| 12:48:37 | <EtnaRosso> | sbp what log stands for? |
| 12:48:40 | <sbp> | yeah, I think I like sourceURI most of all |
| 12:48:53 | <sbp> | EtnaRosso: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log# |
| 13:11:04 | <tommorris> | iand: any chance I can get a yay or nay on sponsorship for SemanticCamp? |
| 15:36:53 | <stain> | If I have <http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/dc/protege-dc.owl#format> - is it then the same as http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/format defined in http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/dc/protege-dc.owl ? If so - how? |
| 15:38:17 | <EtnaRosso> | i can't understand you question |
| 15:38:59 | <EtnaRosso> | probably it is different, because they have different uris |
| 15:39:00 | <stain> | all right.. I have some ontology that uses http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/dc/protege-dc.owl#format and I'm trying to figure out what that's supposed to mean |
| 15:39:35 | <sbp> | so your best bet is to look at how http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/dc/protege-dc.owl defines it |
| 15:40:00 | <sbp> | oh, it doesn't |
| 15:40:05 | <stain> | exactly |
| 15:40:18 | <sbp> | and http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/dc/protege-dc.owl is text/plain anyway |
| 15:40:28 | <stain> | but it does define http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/format which makes me wonder if perhaps the ontology designer has mixed imports and namespaces |
| 15:40:36 | <stain> | (she's on holiday, of course, so I can't ask her) |
| 15:40:37 | <sbp> | yeah, almost certainly |
| 15:40:54 | <sbp> | but then why http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/dc/protege-dc.owl#format should be used instead of http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/format is a mystery |
| 15:41:00 | <sbp> | it's not wrong to do that, but it's pretty bizarre |
| 15:42:29 | <stain> | hm, actually this is not mentioned in the ontologies, it's just in the data in what I would think is not according to the dc-format anyway |
| 15:42:32 | <stain> | j0:format "wsdl" |
| 15:44:30 | <stain> | I really hate this.. someone started with some "We must use RDF!" mantra 4 years ago, and now everyone who did that has left the project and I'm left with the leftovers :) |
| 17:54:25 | <danbri> | ah, I think you have some version of Dublin Core which Protege/DL people cooked up, to work better with their tools (but at expense of interop with wider world) |
| 18:58:27 | <timbl> | stain .., what is the project? |
| 18:59:14 | <timbl> | (Reading back, sounds as though you should call the ontology designer on holiday :-) |
| 19:07:24 | <kidehen> | danbri: u there? |
| 19:08:23 | <kidehen> | phenny, tell danbri: please ping me when you have a minute (irc or skype) |
| 19:08:26 | <phenny> | kidehen: I'll pass that on when danbri is around. |
| 20:17:04 | <lemixtape> | hey |
| 20:17:38 | <lemixtape> | i got a little problem on my hand and I was wondering if anyone could help out |
| 20:22:53 | <TedThibodeauJr> | lemixtape - people tend to idle for long stretches ... but if you ask your SemWeb related question (note the topic...), someone will often anwer within a few hours |
Back to channel and daily index: content-negotiated html turtle